GE2011 Part 4

I almost realised that the oppositions' opposition to the GRC system almost shot themselves in the foot upon observation of how they fielded their candidates this election.

The common argument for a GRC system is that given a SMC system and a majoirty Chinese population, it is very difficult for a non-Chinese candidate to win convincingly in a SMC. As such, the GRC system is set up to ensure minority representation. One look at the election lineup this year, and you will notice something very peculiar. The opposition fielded no non-Chinese candidates in the SMCs, while the PAP fielded at least Michael Palmer.

I wonder why this development? The strongest case for the opposition to dismantle the GRCs is to show that Singaporeans will not vote along racial line. The fact that they are doing, does this mean that they already agree with what the PAP has been arguing so far? If so, then I would think that the PAP is more progressive than the opposition in this area because at least they dare to field Michael Palmer to see if a non-Chinese can win the vote.

I think this is something for all supporters of the opposition to think about.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Parable of the 'Good Samaritan'

Of Teaching and Learning

Iakobou Epistode: From Confusion to Clarity